@oiaohm,
Using a Debian base has advantages and disadvantages too.
I don't want to discuss Debian vs. Slackware. I posted items that *I* consider as "pros". That's my personal experience. Some people might agree, some might disagree.
I still think that GParted should not be officially included in UBCD. Thus, I also do not consider that kernels tested by Debian / GParted are a particular better match to be merged with UBCD; I mean not any more than other kernels. For years we used pmagic's kernels, and pmagic itself is used extensively, independently of UBCD. Other "rescue" OS are based on Gentoo... We even have "cpustress", currently by Explorer09![8)]( "Cool")
, with no specific pre-testing.
GParted is great, very useful, really. I just think it is not the best match to be officially included in UBCD. This is just my personal opinion. BTW, anyone can download an updated GParted Live almost every week.
Using a Debian base has advantages and disadvantages too.
I don't want to discuss Debian vs. Slackware. I posted items that *I* consider as "pros". That's my personal experience. Some people might agree, some might disagree.
I still think that GParted should not be officially included in UBCD. Thus, I also do not consider that kernels tested by Debian / GParted are a particular better match to be merged with UBCD; I mean not any more than other kernels. For years we used pmagic's kernels, and pmagic itself is used extensively, independently of UBCD. Other "rescue" OS are based on Gentoo... We even have "cpustress", currently by Explorer09
, with no specific pre-testing.GParted is great, very useful, really. I just think it is not the best match to be officially included in UBCD. This is just my personal opinion. BTW, anyone can download an updated GParted Live almost every week.